Apply decide.fateofwagdie voting value to a Token of Concord (ToC) made by the WAGDIE Artist Guild.
To reward holders of the official community art collection.
We fully understand the perspective that art itself is utility enough. However, we’d like to provide supporters of WAG with this small perk that imbues art pieces with sustainability and impact in the grander WAGDIE project.
This is a major point of discussion. WAG has come up with two options:
Option 2: If you hold a piece of The WAG Collection you will be able to enter a raffle with (# of WAG artists x 2) winners selected to receive a WAG ToC.
COMMUNITY PRESENTED: Option 3: There will be no WAG ToC. Instead, original pieces of The WAG Collection themselves will be allowed voting value.
We are not tied to the idea of having the WAG specifically minted into the Tokens of Concord contract if there are other efficient means of integrating voting values to airdrops from another contract.
The assigned voting value of the WAG ToC is open to discussion as well. There has been ongoing dialogue on shifting the potency of certain ToCs and we are open to the WAG ToC launching with an assigned value deemed appropriate.
-Minting and transfer fees of ToCs (WAG expense or WAG to reimburse).
To thank supporters of the WAGDIE Artist Guild, we want to provide them with a small perk for holding pieces. We invite the pilgrims of the Forsaken Lands to express their thoughts on the matter.
I second the idea of allowing WAG artist pieces to be used as voting power. It’s a minor lift, I doubt many will argue against WAG getting voting power and it doesn’t detract from value of ToC or WAGDIE.
Both Option 1 and 2 still suffer from the same problem, though.
Editions are cheaper and consist of the same airdrop potential / raffle entries (unless you scale vs price). It’s messy when you consider the inconsistent pricing and supply of WAG pieces and, while fine to just live with as part of the S1 release newness imperfections, it will fundamentally change structures for S2 and beyond.
If not implemented properly, this has substantial capacity to greatly benefit certain types of artists over others, and altering intentions / production for the WAG.
What do we think of giving people 1 vote for holding a WAG NFT, regardless of the amount they hold?
This kind of balances rewarding holders with a vote vs concerns about gaming this or diluting other votes.
Snapshot might have a strategy for this already. We can look into it more if there’s interest in this strategy for WAG holders.